Filed: Sep. 29, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit _ September 29, 2011 ERRATA _ Appeal No. 2010-1382 KIMBERLY-CLARK WORLDWIDE, INC. AND KIMBERLY-CLARK GLOBAL SALES, LLC, v. FIRST QUALITY BABY PRODUCTS, LLC AND FIRST QUALITY RETAIL SERVICES, LLC, Decided: June 1, 2011 Nonprecedential Opinion _ Please make the following changes: Page 10, line 16, change “a” to -an- Page 10, lines 18-19, delete “raised a substantial question of validity for” and insert -asserted a defense to-. Page 10, lines 1
Summary: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit _ September 29, 2011 ERRATA _ Appeal No. 2010-1382 KIMBERLY-CLARK WORLDWIDE, INC. AND KIMBERLY-CLARK GLOBAL SALES, LLC, v. FIRST QUALITY BABY PRODUCTS, LLC AND FIRST QUALITY RETAIL SERVICES, LLC, Decided: June 1, 2011 Nonprecedential Opinion _ Please make the following changes: Page 10, line 16, change “a” to -an- Page 10, lines 18-19, delete “raised a substantial question of validity for” and insert -asserted a defense to-. Page 10, lines 19..
More
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ September 29, 2011 ERRATA ______________________ Appeal No. 2010-1382 KIMBERLY-CLARK WORLDWIDE, INC. AND KIMBERLY-CLARK GLOBAL SALES, LLC, v. FIRST QUALITY BABY PRODUCTS, LLC AND FIRST QUALITY RETAIL SERVICES, LLC, Decided: June 1, 2011 Nonprecedential Opinion ______________________ Please make the following changes: Page 10, line 16, change “a” to --an-- Page 10, lines 18-19, delete “raised a substantial question of validity for” and insert --asserted a defense to--. Page 10, lines 19-20, delete “cannot be characterized as substantially meritless” and insert --raises a substantial question of validity and does not lack substantial merit-- Page 14, lines 1-2, delete “raised a substantial question of validity for” and insert --asserted a defense to-- Page 14, line 3 delete “cannot be characterized as sub- KIMBERLY-CLARK v. FIRST QUALITY 2 stantially meritless” and insert --raises a substantial question of validity and does not lack substantial merit-- Page 18, line 2, delete “raised a substantial question of validity for” and insert --asserted a defense to-- Page 18, line 3-4, delete “cannot be characterized as substantially meritless” and insert --raises a substantial question of validity and does not lack substantial merit--